Triomphe à l'anglaise : c'est Gordon Brown, celui qui empêcha Tony Blair d'adopter l'euro, qui introduit l'Eurogroupe. C'est lui, le magicien du social-libéralisme anglo-saxon, qui donne des leçons d'interventionnisme aux continentaux. Pendant une demi-heure, il expose le plan de sauvetage britannique dont il a proposé, dès le 8 octobre, de généraliser à l'Europe une des mesures-clés : la garantie des prêts interbancaires.
The New York Times takes a similar line:
The damn plan better work after all this.What we do know, however, is that Mr. Brown and Alistair Darling, the chancellor of the Exchequer (equivalent to our Treasury secretary), have defined the character of the worldwide rescue effort, with other wealthy nations playing catch-up.
This is an unexpected turn of events. The British government is, after all, very much a junior partner when it comes to world economic affairs.
It’s true that London is one of the world’s great financial centers, but the British economy is far smaller than the U.S. economy, and the Bank of England doesn’t have anything like the influence either of the Federal Reserve or of the European Central Bank. So you don’t expect to see Britain playing a leadership role.
But the Brown government has shown itself willing to think clearly about the financial crisis, and act quickly on its conclusions. And this combination of clarity and decisiveness hasn’t been matched by any other Western government, least of all our own.
3 comments:
Triomphe à l'anglaise? Anglo-saxon?!
Le Monde, eh? That would be a Belgian paper, oui? ;-)
Incidentally, and entirely coincidentally, the author of your New York Times piece today won the Nobel Prize for economics.
I don't think this economic rescue package will return us to 'the good old days' But hopefully it will help to protect the system from the risk that has been built up over 20 years.
Post a Comment