31 January 2007

On and on and on

The latest opinion poll in The Scotsman indicates that the SNP will gain 44 seats, compared with 41 for Labour, 23 for the LibDems and 17 for the Tories. (Yawn.) Professor John Curtice comments:
Arithmetically at least it appears a SNP-Liberal Democrat coalition is a realistic option.
But of course whether the two parties can reach a political accommodation is perhaps the $64,000 question of this election - and one to which we will not receive an answer, if at all, until after 3 May.
And here comes the hidden bad news for Mr Salmond in our poll. On the basis of our projection not only could the Liberal Democrats strike a deal with the SNP, but they could also do so with Labour. True, Labour and the Liberal Democrats would still be one short of a majority, but doubtless they could entice at least one MSP from the ranks of the independents to help them.
In these circumstances Nicol Stephen, the Liberal Democrat leader, would have a trump card. He could always walk out and talk to the other side.

Well yes, Mr Stephen could indeed talk to Labour. But what about? Labour are committed to nuclear policies and the council tax; the LibDems would have fought on a platform against both. And would Mr Stephen want to get into bed with a Labour Party which had effectively lost the election? The people have spoken (the bastards), so we just ignore the outcome and carry on with a Lab/LibDem coalition as before?

Update:

Interestingly, even Alan Cochrane in The Telegraph thinks that the SNP and the LibDems might play footsie:

The problem is as it's always been, namely that the more Labour scares people off voting for the Nats and the break-up of the United Kingdom, the greater is the likelihood of anti-Labour voters plumping for the Lib Dems.
Isn't that good news for unionists? Not necessarily, and for the following reason: if the SNP emerge as the biggest party, they will still need a coalition partner to form an administration. Although the Lib Dems say they won't get into bed with the Nats if a referendum on independence is on the cards, can they really resist some of the other blandishments that Alex Salmond might offer?
For instance, what if Mr Salmond offers them a referendum on Holyrood being allowed to raise and spend its own taxes or a revived commission - like that recently convened by David Steel - on increased powers for the Scottish Parliament? Will the Lib Dems turn down a coalition on these grounds?
As has been remarked upon before in this space, all Mr Salmond wants is to get into Bute House and to prove that his team can be as least as competent in government - albeit a devolved one - as is Labour now. Then, he plans to bide his time and engineer as many disputes with the Westminster government as he can, in the hope that the voters eventually view independence
as inevitable.

4 comments:

Mark McDonald said...

Nicol's tying himself in knots.

By ruling out a coalition with the SNP he has simply painted himself into a corner.

It seems increasingly clear that Labour, the Liberals and the Tories are planning an anti-SNP coalition, as evidenced by Goldie's continuous "soft" questions at FMQs.

As I called it on my blog, a grand coalition of self interest.

Anonymous said...

Salmond has painted himself into a corner by refusing to deal with the Tories, the only pro enterprise party at Holyrood.

An independent Scotland would need serious action on the economy, the Lab-Libs have done nothing, the Greens are against it in principle, and as for the infantile socialists.....

So Salmond has effectivly said I deal with the Lib Dems or nobody. No wonder the Lib Dems are grinning.

What a fool, what an absolute fool.

Anonymous said...

But what would the SNP get out of any Faustian pact with the Tories? There'd be splits over nuclear policy and local income tax; the Tories don't have a clear idea what extra powers, if any, they'd like for Holyrood; they're all over the place on tax and there'd be no independence referendum.

There's also the fact that Annabell Goldie would rather prop up a minority Labour administration than support the SNP. And that's before you consider that only about 2 of the current Tory group - Derek Brownlee and Murdo Fraser - are sufficiently competent to hold down any sort of ministerial brief.

Sod that. The Scottish Tories might be in need of resuscitation, but until they sort themselves out I don't see why it should be the SNP that gives them the kiss of life.

Anonymous said...

on the basis of scotsman poll, labour would need one vote extra...... anyone examined margo's praise of 'wee jack'?(documentary on her showed, with her agreement, her desk space covered with jack photos, bizarre, but true) He'd get his majority, and she'd get her place in history. Scarey, but possible..........